Uploaded image for project: 'Z39.50'
  1. Z39.50
  2. ZF-59

New MARC fields/subfields should come into existence when named in post-processing rules

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Story
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • TBD
    • Resolution: Done
    • None
    • 2.5.0
    • None
    • Thor

    Description

      As noted in comments to ZF-57, we have problems with post-processing rules that fill in the value of one field with that of another, implementing fallback – as for item-level copy-number falling back to holdings-level copy-number. In such cases, the rule never runs because the field it is transforming doesn't exist.

      Such fields should be summoned into existence, bowl-of-petunias-like.

      TestRail: Results

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

                mike Mike Taylor
                mike Mike Taylor
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  TestRail: Runs

                    TestRail: Cases