[UXPROD-2776] Support for Separate Reserve Teams or Libraries within a Single Tenant - FOLIO Issue Tracker

XML

Word

Printable

Details

Type: New Feature
Status: Open (View Workflow)
Priority: TBD
Resolution: Unresolved
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Component/s: None
Labels:
- courses

Template:
UXPROD features customfield_11200 40842
Potential Workaround:
All Courses could contain
Epic Link:
Course Reserves
Development Team:
None
Calculated Total Rank:
Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE):
41
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019):
R5
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020):
R5
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021):
R4
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021):
R1
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021):
R1
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020):
R4
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020):
R3
Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021):
R4
Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020):
R4
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021):
R1
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020):
R1
Rank: Warner (MVP Jul 2020):
R4

Description

Current situation or problem:
In a tenant with multiple libraries (either that of a consortia, or a large multi-library institution) all Courses and co-mingled. The Course Reserves app does not allow for associating a course with any particular library.

Users would like to be able to separate out Courses and Reserves associated with the individual libraries.

Also need to be able to filter courses for Discovery harvesting and display

Use case(s)

Proposed solution/stories
Could work similar to acquisition units.
Could be based on Tenant settings.
Links to additional info

Questions
Does this feature include both the ability to search and sort, as well as permissions?

TestRail: Results

Attachments

Issue Links

mentioned in: Page Loading...

Activity

People

Assignee:: Unassigned

Reporter:: Kelly Drake

Votes:: 2 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 5 Start watching this issue

Dates

Created:: 22/Oct/20 4:49 PM

Updated:: 16/Feb/22 3:53 PM

Support for Separate Reserve Teams or Libraries within a Single Tenant