Uploaded image for project: 'UX Product'
  1. UX Product
  2. UXPROD-2663

Inventory. Tenant settings for item list in the top of the instance record

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: New Feature
    • Status: Draft (View Workflow)
    • Priority: P3
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Template:
      UXPROD features
    • Epic Link:
    • Development Team:
      None
    • Calculated Total Rank:
      42
    • Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020):
      R1
    • Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021):
      R3
    • Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021):
      R2
    • Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021):
      R2
    • Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020):
      R3
    • Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021):
      R3
    • Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020):
      R2
    • Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021):
      R3
    • Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020):
      R2

      Description

      Overview: The item list on the Instance record is by now stretching the use of the multi column list (MCL) to it's limits, and more new columns are being suggested; e.g. a new column for copy number (uChicago and Public libraries) - UIIN-1251
      Substitute MCL display with a card display has been considered, but this solution is not on the near term Stripes Force roadmap.

      Goal: Develop a customizable MCL list, where each tenant can configure a
      the customizable view and also having the ability to set order for of the columns.
      The solution will include a way to save the preferences for the display of the item list per tenant.

      Capturing a list of library preferences (libraries in production and round-iv libraries): https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1UeEi-UqVaH7cdZYQv0NOzYyCYIOJ2dvFI7vzlaJyZoc/edit#slide=id.p

      Out of scope: - but to be considered long term:

      • possibility to set different views for different functional areas (e.g. something similar as teams in Acquisition)
      • possibility to set different views per user

      Other comments:
      At MM-SIG a user defined view was discussed 1/21/2021 - and the feed back and conclusion was that the MM-SIG want to have the long term work implemented, and will not prioritize implementation of a user session defined display

      Slide deck with some mock-ups for the user session defined display:
      https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1M18Xd2CtdntlEhvhHZpoT_RoFqOJW-Iw3HwOexPs8MQ/edit#slide=id.p

        TestRail: Results

          Attachments

            Issue Links

              Activity

                People

                Assignee:
                Unassigned Unassigned
                Reporter:
                charlotte Charlotte Whitt
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:

                    TestRail: Runs

                      TestRail: Cases