Details
-
Story
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
P2
-
Resolution: Done
-
None
Description
Purpose: To enhance the location crud UX to provide better consistency. This suggestion came from the RA SIG.
User story: As an administrator who is creating location records, I want to have type-ahead in the "Name" fields of Location Details so I get some guidance as to which names are being used in my FOLIO installation and I can re-use where possible.
Scenarios:
- Scenario
- Given the location create and edit forms at Settings > Organization > Locations
- When I type into the Name field in the Location details section
- Then folio should provide auto-complete suggestions based on the names entered for other locations in folio
- Scenario
- Given a location in FOLIO has a Location details name/value pair with the Name "Foo"
- When I type "F" or "Fo" into a Name field in the Location details section
- Then folio should provide Foo as an auto-complete suggestion
- Scenario
- Given only one location in FOLIO has a Location details name/value pair with the Name "Foo" AND that location detail name/value pair with the Name "Foo" has been deleted and the record saved
- When I type "F" or "Fo" into a Name field in the Location details section
- Then folio should NOT provide Foo as an auto-complete suggestion
TestRail: Results
Attachments
Issue Links
- is blocked by
-
STCOM-311 Autocomplete component
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
MODINVSTOR-308 Missed "details" field in location response.
-
- Closed
-
-
UXPROD-114 Location hierarchy CRUD via UI
-
- Closed
-
-
UIORG-69 CRU Locations (Hierarchical)
-
- Closed
-