Uploaded image for project: 'mod-inventory-storage'
  1. mod-inventory-storage
  2. MODINVSTOR-237

Performance: GET 200 - Get updated mod-inventory/item by using modInventoryItemId

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Core: Platform

    Description

      The response time for GET 200 - Get updated mod-inventory/item by using modInventoryItemId is 155965 on average.

      Acceptance criteria: this issue is blocked until we establish expected response times (see FOLIO-1744)

      TestRail: Results

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            blocks

            Umbrella - FOLIO-1711 Performance issues reported through the automatic perf testing Q1

            • P3 - low priority level, item will be considered for inclusion in the next dev cycle
            • Closed
            is blocked by

            Task - A task that needs to be done. FOLIO-1744 SPIKE: establish expected response time for performance benchmarks in Jenkins

            • P3 - low priority level, item will be considered for inclusion in the next dev cycle
            • Closed

            Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. MODINVSTOR-248 filtering /item-storage/items when used with 'query=id=XXX' is too slow

            • P2 - normal priority level, must be included in the current development cycle
            • Closed
            relates to

            Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. MODAT-42 Fix caching issue

            • P2 - normal priority level, must be included in the current development cycle
            • Closed

            New Feature - New feature requests FOLIO-1647 Local performance test strategy

            • P3 - low priority level, item will be considered for inclusion in the next dev cycle
            • Closed

            Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. MODINVSTOR-134 item-storage API - GET after doing POST from item-storage(4 concurrent users) by itemId takes ~7 seconds

            • P3 - low priority level, item will be considered for inclusion in the next dev cycle
            • Closed

            Activity

              People

                evaluk Eric Valuk
                huff Jeremy Huff
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  TestRail: Runs

                    TestRail: Cases