Details
-
Story
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
TBD
-
Resolution: Done
-
-
ERM Sprint 89, ERM Sprint 90
-
Bienenvolk
Description
Agreement names should be unique.
If a user tries to save an agreement with the same name as an existing agreement, an in-form validation message should be displayed "This name already exists".
See Settings > Local KB admin > New external data source for an example (shown in screen shot below).
If existing names need to be migrated to be unique, then they should have a numeric suffix added until they are unique (e.g. "agreement A" and "agreement A" become "agreement A" and "agreement A_1"
TestRail: Results
Attachments
Issue Links
- defines
-
ERM-891 Require Agreement Names to be unique (Backend Validation)
-
- Closed
-
-
UXPROD-1669 UX improvements for Agreements up to Q3 2020
-
- Closed
-