Details
-
Story
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
TBD
-
Resolution: Done
-
-
ERM Sprint 159, ERM Sprint 160, ERM Sprint 161, ERM Sprint 162, ERM Sprint 163, ERM Sprint 164
-
Bienenvolk
-
Poppy (R2 2023)
-
TBD
Description
Purpose:
Within an Agreement, linked licenses can display as "Historical", "Future" or "Controlling". Currently the order that the licenses display in is not controlled. This story is to make t he ordering consistent and predictable
User story statement(s):
As a librarian
I want to view an agreement and linked licenses in a consistent order
so that I can easily navigate the list of linked licenses
Scenarios:
- Scenario:
- Given an agreement with multiple linked licenses with status within agreement "Future"
- When I view the agreement
- Then the licenses with status within agreement "Future" are sorted by (in order):
- license start date (the earliest date first)
- license end date (the earliest date first)
- name
- Scenario:
- Given an agreement with multiple linked licenses with status within agreement "Historical"
- When I view the agreement
- Then the licenses with status within agreement "Historical" are sorted by (in order):
- license start date (the latest date first)
- license end date (the latest date first)
- name
Other information:
If the specific sorts defined above are not possible, we should aim for at least consistency (i.e. the licenses display in the same order every time)
Interested parties:
Kyushu University
TestRail: Results
Attachments
Issue Links
- defines
-
ERM-2660 ui-agreements release. Fix version: 10.0.0 (Poppy)
-
- Closed
-
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...