Details
-
Story
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
TBD
-
Resolution: Done
-
None
-
ERM Sprint 135, ERM Sprint 136, ERM Sprint 137, ERM Sprint 138, ERM Sprint 139, ERM Sprint 140, ERM Sprint 141, ERM Sprint 142, ERM Sprint 143, ERM Sprint 144, ERM Sprint 145, ERM Sprint 146
-
Bienenvolk
-
Morning Glory (R2 2022)
-
TBD
Description
Purpose:
Over time the list of license terms or agreement properties that are recorded by an institution may change. However, the term values on older licenses/agreements need to be maintained. This story is to add the ability to make terms "deprecated" so that they are not displayed when adding new property values to new licenses/agreements and are displayed as "deprecated" terms when viewing licenses/agreements that have them already set.
User story statement(s):
As an ERM administrator
I want to be able to make a license term or agreement supplementary/OA property 'deprecated'
so that it can no longer be used to set a value on a license/agreement
As an ERM librarian
I want to be able to see 'deprecated' properties on a license/agreement separately to other values
so that I can easily see which properties are deprecated for my organisation
Scenarios:
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Licenses -> Terms
- When I edit a term
- Then I see the option to mark a term as "deprecated"
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Licenses -> Terms
- When I mark a term as deprecated and the term is not marked as a primary term
- Then I can save the term
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Licenses -> Terms
- When I mark a term as deprecated and the term is marked as a primary term
- Then I cannot save the term (i.e. it is not possible for a term to be both 'primary' and 'deprecated'
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Licenses -> Terms
- When I view a term
- Then I can see whether the term is deprecated or not in the term view
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Agreements -> Supplementary properties
- When I edit a property
- Then I see the option to mark a property as "deprecated"
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Agreements -> Supplementary properties
- When I mark a property as deprecated and the property is not marked as a primary property
- Then I can save the property
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Agreements -> Supplementary properties
- When I mark a property as deprecated and the property is marked as a primary property
- Then I cannot save the property (i.e. it is not possible for a property to be both 'primary' and 'deprecated'
- Scenario:
- Given Settings -> Agreements -> Supplementary properties
- When I view a property
- Then I can see whether the property is deprecated or not in the property view
- Scenario:
- Given a license term definition is "deprecated"
- When I edit a license
- Then I do not see the term as one I can add to the license in the term name dropdown
- Scenario:
- Given an agreement supplementary property is "deprecated"
- When I edit an agreement
- Then I do not see the term as one I can add to the agreement in the supplementary property name dropdown
- Scenario:
- Given an agreement OA property is "deprecated"
- When I edit an agreement
- Then I do not see the term as one I can add to the agreement in the OA property name dropdown
- Scenario:
- Scenario:
- Given an agreement has a value for a property (supplementary or OA) marked as 'deprecated'
- When I view the agreement properties in the appropriate accordion
- Then I see values for any deprecated properties listed at the bottom of the list of properties, with "DEPRECATED: " in front of the property name in the display
TestRail: Results
Attachments
Issue Links
- defines
-
ERM-2021 mod-licenses release. Fix version: 4.2.0
-
- Closed
-
-
ERM-2025 ui-agreements release. Fix version: 8.2.0
-
- Closed
-
-
ERM-2028 mod-agreements release. Fix version: 5.2.0
-
- Closed
-
-
ERM-2030 ui-licenses release. Fix version: 8.2.1.
-
- Closed
-
-
UXPROD-3407 Licenses and Agreements | Ability to deprecate license terms/agreement supplementary properties
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
ERM-2078 Accordion header Count for custom properties should only include set properties
-
- Closed
-
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...