Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
P3
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
-
19.2.3
-
None
-
Core: F - Sprint 102
-
3
-
Prokopovych
-
R1 2021
Description
Scope for sprint 102: Timebox to investigate - 2 to 3 days
Overview:
The GET /circulation/loans?query=(userId==$userID and status.name<>Closed) API regressed in Honeysuckle by 50%-60%, compared to Goldenrod, in 5, 8, or 20 concurrent users test run of the check-in-check-out workflow. In Goldenrod, under 8 users test, it used to take ~75ms to return a response, now in Honeysuckle it takes ~112ms.
Steps to Reproduce:
Call the API over and over again in a JMeter test with 5-8 concurrent users for half an hour in both Goldenrod and Honeysuckle to compare performances.
Expected Results:
Response time unchanged or slower as expected (if known beforehand).
Actual Results:
Responses were 50% slower
Additional Information:
PTF may be able to provide stack traces of calling this API in both environments for comparison. TBD.
Interested parties:
cboerema marcjohnson
TestRail: Results
Attachments
Issue Links
- is cloned by
-
PERF-140 Investigate - GET /circulation/loans Regressed in Honeysuckle
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
FOLIO-2888 investigate performance regression in storage GET API
-
- Open
-
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...